Let
our people know!
The
secret is being leaked, even by
some rare labor leaders: the
rights of members inside their
unions are protected by federal
law. But the full story is yet to
emerge.
Section 105 of the LMRDA
provides, briefly, clearly, and
in full, "Every labor
organization shall inform its
members concerning the provisions
of this Act." Period. Now,
three members of the Machinists
union, represented by attorney
Andrew Rotstein, are asking a
federal judge to compel their
union to obey the law. The union
resists. The case has been heard.
The judge is thinking it over.
Back in 1960, a few unions did
print the full LMRDA text in
their publications. But since
then not one single union, not
one, has complied with the law.
The problem is that this section
of the law is not self-enforcing.
No government administrative
agency has the authority to
demand enforcement. Private suit
by union members is required. The
IAM suit is the first of its
kind.
Meanwhile, the Labor Department
has prepared a one-page summary
entitled "Union Member
Rights & Officer
Responsibilities under the
LMRDA," and is asking
internationals to provide the
information to their locals. This
single "outreach" sheet
has been around for some time
but, as far as we know, the
Department has only now begun to
promote it. Perhaps this novel
outburst of energy was inspired
by the Machinists' suit. Perhaps
it is a coincidence.
So far, to our knowledge, two
unions have responded. We'd like
to think that this too was
prompted by the suit. The
Masters, Mates, and Pilots
reprinted the DOL sheet in the
May/June issue of its magazine.
Tom Sever, Teamsters secretary
treasurer, sent it to all local
unions asking them "to make
this publication available to
their members."
The distribution of this handbill
is much better than nothing,
which is what unions have done
before --- that is, nothing. But
it is still quite inadequate,
hardly enough to satisfy the
requirements of Section 105.
It is difficult in a single 8 1/2
x 11 sheet to present a
full-bodied explanation of the
law. But this version omits one
whole critical subject. It is not
enough to list the rights which
members are supposed to enjoy. It
is essential to indicate how
those rights can be enforced when
they are violated, that is, what
recourse the law provides against
illegal acts by union officials.
|